Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

CME + Pitney Bowes = no goes

2811 12.4(15)T1

CME 4.2

Multi Flex T1 v2

NM-HDA-4FXS

I've seen one post on here about a Pitney Bowes postage scale, Call Manager, and FXS ports. My setup is somewhat the same, except the customer has a T1 delivering 17 loopstart channels.

The other topic somewhat strayed away from the subject.. has anyone else had experience with this? The T1 is error free, and faxes are working properly, however the postage scale cuts off halfway through negotiation.

I haven't tried lowering the baud rate on the PB scale yet maybe that will be my next step. I didn't do much on the router side either though except for turning off comfort noise on the fxs port. Would the rate disabling under 'voice service pots' have any affect? Thanks in advance.

6 REPLIES
Hall of Fame Super Gold

Re: CME + Pitney Bowes = no goes

Hi, can you send complete output of "show controllers T1" ?

New Member

Re: CME + Pitney Bowes = no goes

The intervals are too long to post.

T1 0/0/0 is up.

Applique type is Channelized T1

Cablelength is long gain36 0db

No alarms detected.

alarm-trigger is not set

Soaking time: 3, Clearance time: 10

AIS State:Clear LOS State:Clear LOF State:Clear

Version info Firmware: 20070320, FPGA: 20, spm_count = 0

Framing is ESF, Line Code is B8ZS, Clock Source is Line.

CRC Threshold is 320. Reported from firmware is 320.

Data in current interval (544 seconds elapsed):

0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations

0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins

0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs

Data in Interval 94:

0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations

0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins

0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs

Data in Interval 95:

0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations

0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins

0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs

Data in Interval 96:

0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations

0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins

0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs

Total Data (last 24 hours)

0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations,

0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins,

0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs

Hall of Fame Super Gold

Re: CME + Pitney Bowes = no goes

You are right, squeaky clean T1.

You can try adjusting the levels a bit on the fxs ports, but I'm not sure it will help.

New Member

Re: CME + Pitney Bowes = no goes

anyone else have any input on the subject? it sounds like the baud rate needs to be lowered on the machine.. but any other ideas are appreciated.

New Member

Re: CME + Pitney Bowes = no goes

I ran into a similar problem with a PB machine at an University Mailroom working off a VG248. Faxes worked fine, but the PB modem would not establish connection. The solution was to drop the output levels on the VG248 port (output attenuation, around 6 or 9 db).

The audio signal was to strong for the modem, since it was only about 50 ft of copper wire between the VG 248, and the PB machine.

New Member

Re: CME + Pitney Bowes = no goes

Looked here for assistance. I had issues with Pitney Bowes postal machine connecting. Found slips on the PRI interface (0/1/0). Issued the network-clock-select 1 T1 0/1/0 command and resolved the problem.

Thanks!

819
Views
0
Helpful
6
Replies