I am a fairly unique situation here and would love to get some advice. We are consolidating and upgrading a multi-cluster install still on CCM 4.x to a single cluster UC on UCS 8.6. There are three major cities involved, each city will retain dual subs and a tftp server, plus a PRI router bank for toll bypass between cities. Each city has multiple (20+) sites, with all sites having local router with PRI (layer 9 issue ) All phones have 7-digit extension, all sites are in the same area code, but it is LD to call between cities.
We are trying to come up with a simplified dial plan to reduce the number of routes and eliminate @ patterns. The customer wants to retain 1 for LD calls, but not use 9 for off-net calling. TEHO between cities should be handled by the PRI cluster in the city being called. We can use local route groups to reduce some of the patterns, but we are trying to figure out a good way to handle the toll-bypass calls between cities without creating a pattern for every office code or using the @ pattern. Thoughts?
You have reached the Cisco Logistics Support Center.. To Check Status of
your RMA, visit Product Returns & Replacements (RMA). Need help? Contact
us by Phone or Email. North Americas Phone: 1800 553 2447 Option 4
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Europe Phone: +3...
The short answer is that you don't.... That isn't entirely true while at
the same time it kind of is, but for the most part you don't configure
the softkeys. You enable or disable them via TCL. Here is the long
answer. Be sure to read the whole thing or e...
Topology: IP Phone > Switches > Microsoft NPS setup to forward 802.1x
proxy to > ISE 2.1 patch 3 Authentication: EAP-TLS using Cisco MIC SANs
Phone Models 802.1X support? 802.1x flavor Addtl Comment EAP-MD5 EAP-TLS
Cisco 3905 Y Y N Cisco 6911 Y Y N Cisco ...