Display Name doesn't show on calling party, when the call forwards
Today, i have noticed an issue in my customer environment that they have 2 Cisco IP Phones (Phone A and Phone B), we have a call forward from Phone A to Phone B after 2 rings....
Phone A - Extension 3573001 - Display Name "Phone A" (The same name has been set to Alerting as well as connected on CUCM)
Phone B - Extension 3503001 - Display Name "Phone B" (The same name has been set to Alerting as well as connected on CUCM)
Calling party calls 3573001 --> It forwards the call to 3503001 after 2 rings, when 3573001 rings, calling party gets the display name as "Phone A" as it should be, but when the call goes to 3503001, on the calling party's display the name does not display but the extension number.
I dont have an idea where we do block the display name.. Both these numbers are reside in the same cluster (Ver 18.104.22.16802-1), but they belong to 2 different sites.
I look forward your suggesstions to rectify this issue... Please advise.
SIP traces provide key information in troubleshooting SIP Trunks, SIP
endpoints and other SIP related issues. Even though these traces are in
clear text, these texts can be gibberish unless you understand fully
what they mean. This document attempts to br...
Please find the attached HTML document, download and open it on your PC.
This provides an easy to use form where you simply answer a few
questions and it will render the proper jabber-config.xml file for you
to copy/paste. There is built in logic to verif...
[toc:faq]CUCM Database Replication is an area in which Cisco customers
and partners have asked for more in-depth training in being able to
properly assess a replication problem and potentially resolve an issue
without involving TAC. This document discusse...