Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Exchange UM transfering calls to CUCM

I am trying to setup CUCM to work with Exchange UM.  I have been able to successfully get CUCM to call into Exchange UM and take messages as well I can call an Auto Attendant I created.  The problem is that when Exchange UM tries to transfer a call back I get a prompt stating "The call cannot be transferred, returning to the main menu".

I have collected some logs during the call and I can see Exchange is sending a refer back into CUCM but it doesn't seem to be working still.  Here is the SIP refer message followed by a 202 Accept message that I get.

07/22/2014 13:49:54.148 CCM|//SIP/SIPTcp/wait_SdlReadRsp: Incoming SIP TCP message from X.X.X.17 on port 5067 index 323 with 727 bytes:
REFER sip:callingnumber@X.X.X.30:5060;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
FROM: <sip:UMExtention@exchange.url>;epid=594A9989AF;tag=ceb39030bc
TO: <sip:callingnumber@X.X.X.30>;tag=9d01c512-f4dc-4f1e-81ef-dcc31ff35a08-52089133
CSEQ: 3 REFER
CALL-ID: 4dd84d80-3ce1c050-2b0-1e02010a@X.X.X.30
MAX-FORWARDS: 70
VIA: SIP/2.0/TCP X.X.X.17:5067;branch=z9hG4bK13b4d580
CONTACT: <sip:exchange.url:5067;transport=Tcp;maddr=X.X.X.17;ms-opaque=ed5b6cc48304b78b>;automata;text;audio;video;image
CONTENT-LENGTH: 0
EXPIRES: 600
REFER-TO: <sip:TransferToExtention@X.X.X.30;user=phone;phone-context=dialstring>
REFERRED-BY: <sip:AAExtintion@X.X.X.30>
USER-AGENT: RTCC/5.0.0.0 MSExchangeUM/15.00.0913.000
P-ASSERTED-IDENTITY: <sip:AAExtention@X.X.X.30>

 

07/22/2014 13:49:54.153 CCM|//SIP/SIPTcp/wait_SdlSPISignal: Outgoing SIP TCP message to X.X.X.17 on port 5067 index 323
SIP/2.0 202 Accepted
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:49:54 GMT
From: <sip:UMExtention@exchange.url>;tag=ceb39030bc;epid=594A9989AF
Content-Length: 0
To: "name" <sip:callingnumber@X.X.X.30>;tag=9d01c512-f4dc-4f1e-81ef-dcc31ff35a08-52089133
Contact: <sip:callingnumber@X.X.X.30:5060;transport=tcp>
Call-ID: 4dd84d80-3ce1c050-2b0-1e02010a@X.X.X.30
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP X.X.X.17:5067;branch=z9hG4bK13b4d580
CSeq: 3 REFER

 

This is using exchange 2013 and CUCM 7.1.5

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
VIP Super Bronze

Does the Rerouting Calling

Does the Rerouting Calling Search Space on the SIP trunk to/from Exchange UM have a CSS that can reach the TransferToExtention@X.X.X.30 referral destination? REFER messages are not subject to the standard CSS under Inbound Calls.

Also, you will likely want to set the Out-Of-Dialog Refer Calling Search Space and create a SIP Trunk Security Profile which accepts out-of-dialog refer, unsolicited notification, and replaces header. These are all related to the "Listen via phone" feature that users will see within Outlook.

Please remember to rate helpful responses and identify helpful or
3 REPLIES
New Member

Just wanted to add that after

Just wanted to add that after CUCM sends out the 202 Accepted message it then sends out 2 Notify messages.  One is a 100 trying and the second is a 404 Not Found message.

VIP Super Bronze

Does the Rerouting Calling

Does the Rerouting Calling Search Space on the SIP trunk to/from Exchange UM have a CSS that can reach the TransferToExtention@X.X.X.30 referral destination? REFER messages are not subject to the standard CSS under Inbound Calls.

Also, you will likely want to set the Out-Of-Dialog Refer Calling Search Space and create a SIP Trunk Security Profile which accepts out-of-dialog refer, unsolicited notification, and replaces header. These are all related to the "Listen via phone" feature that users will see within Outlook.

Please remember to rate helpful responses and identify helpful or
New Member

Hi Jonathan,It did turn out

Hi Jonathan,

It did turn out to be the Rerouting Calling Search Space on the SIP trunk.  I had set the Out-Of-Dialog Refer Calling Search Space as I thought that was the one used on a REFER message.  I did already have the other options setup as you suggested.

Thanks!

547
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies