Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Incoming Call not working on FXO with MGCP Gateway

Hi friends,

              I'm using CUCM 8.6 with gateway 2901, configured as MGCP. I'm Using VIC2-2FXO for PSTN termination.The outgoing calls from fxo is working fine. But the incoming calls hangs up and not ringing the ip phone.

ccm-manager mgcp

no ccm-manager fax protocol cisco

ccm-manager music-on-hold

ccm-manager config server 10.10.10.201

ccm-manager config

!

mgcp

mgcp call-agent 10.10.10.201 2427 service-type mgcp version 0.1

mgcp dtmf-relay voip codec all mode out-of-band

mgcp rtp unreachable timeout 1000 action notify

mgcp modem passthrough voip mode nse

mgcp package-capability rtp-package

mgcp package-capability sst-package

mgcp package-capability pre-package

no mgcp package-capability res-package

no mgcp timer receive-rtcp

mgcp sdp simple

mgcp fax t38 inhibit

mgcp bind control source-interface GigabitEthernet0/1.20

mgcp bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet0/1.20

voice-port 0/0/0

supervisory disconnect dualtone mid-call

cptone SA

timing hookflash-out 50

I debugged mgcp incoming calls, I got the following replay.

CME_2901#

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcpapp_process_sys_msg(208):[lvl=0]MGCP sys msg: (EXTERNAL_EVENT)

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/xlate_mgcp_sys_ev(69):[lvl=0]xlate sys msg: (EXTERNAL_EVENT, 31625

454)

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcpapp_process_sys_msg(217):[lvl=0]sys msg values: (INVALID MGCP

EVENT, 0,  , 3645, CALL_IDLE)

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_handle_cmapp_event(441):[lvl=0]process

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_cmapp_send_keepalive(286):[lvl=0]send NTFY KeepAlive

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/xgcp_endpt_get_by_ifn(1330):[lvl=0]Entered

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/xgcp_endpt_get_tree_link_by_ifn(1149):[lvl=0]Entered

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/xgcp_endpt_compute_key(198):[lvl=0]type -1 slot FFFFFFFF subunit F

FFFB650

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/xgcp_endpt_get_tree_link_by_ifn(1161):[lvl=0]computed key 0xF0000000

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/send_mgcp_empty_notify_msg(3675):[lvl=1]endpt *, complete_endpt *@CME_2901

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_packet(864):[lvl=0]Entered

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_estimate_msg_buf_length(496):[lvl=1]328 bytes needed for header

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_estimate_msg_buf_length(785):[lvl=1]373 bytes needed after checking parameter lines

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_estimate_msg_buf_length(808):[lvl=1]373 bytes needed  after cheking SDP lines

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_parameter_lines(9542):[lvl=0]Entered

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_val_mandatory_parms(13064):[lvl=0]Entered

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_request_id(10015):[lvl=0]Entered

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_request_id(10035):[lvl=0]SUCCESS: Request ID string building is OK

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_obs_events(11420):[lvl=0]Entered

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_obs_events(11428):[lvl=0]mp_head_obs_evt_list NOT NULL

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_obs_events(11468):[lvl=0]out of for loop for next nodein list

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_parameter_lines(9845):[lvl=0]SUCCESS: Building MGCP Parameter lines is OK

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_packet(1018):[lvl=1]SUCCESS: MGCP message building OK -END of building

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_get_ne_info(2744):[lvl=0]Entered

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_get_ne_info(2768):[lvl=1]Used endpoint NE 10.10.10.201

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_enq_retx_msg(911):[lvl=0]trans_id 519806332,ntfy_ent 10.10.10.201

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_root_get_profile(1905):[lvl=0]Entered

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/MGCP_NEDB_get_next_addr(1211):[lvl=1]

NOTIFY ENTITY = 10.10.10.201next->10.10.10.201

      <END>

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_add_trans_id_rec(1155):[lvl=1]Add trans id (519806332, 2A1AEC30) record

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_stw_timer_start(393):[lvl=0]timer type 0, duration 500

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_stw_timer_start(393):[lvl=0]timer type 15, duration 20000

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: MGCP Packet sent to 10.10.10.201:2427--->NTFY 519806332 *@CME_2901 MGCP 0.1

X: 0O:

<---

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/send_mgcp_empty_notify_msg(3738):[lvl=2]NTFY Packet sent successfully - *

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_count_active_mgc_msg_stat(239):[lvl=1]MGC stat - 10.10.10.201, total=24105, succ=23744, failed=240

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: MGCP Packet received from 10.10.10.201:2427--->200 519806332

<---

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcpapp_process_mgcp_msg(3534):[lvl=0] : <NEW MGCP MSG From CA>

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_parse_packet(312):[lvl=0]call mgcp_parse_header

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_parse_packet(316):[lvl=0]out mgcp_parse_header

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_parse_packet(326):[lvl=1]SUCCESS: - MGCP Header parsing was OK

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_parse_packet(344):[lvl=2]SUCCESS: - END of Parsing

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_msg_ack(6876):[lvl=0]Entered

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_count_active_mgc_msg_stat(239):[lvl=1]MGC stat - 10.10.10.201, total=24105, succ=23745, failed=240

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_msg_ack(6948):[lvl=1]Removing msg : NTFY 519806332 *@CME_2901

MGCP 0.1

X: 0

O:

Jan 29 07:27:30.532: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcpapp_process_socket(3645):[lvl=0]Entered

What will be the issue,

Your replay will be highly appreciated

1 REPLY
Hall of Fame Super Silver

Incoming Call not working on FXO with MGCP Gateway

Is your MGCP port defined to point to the phone's DN?  Is the Calling Search Space applied to the GW listing the Parition of the phone's DN?

Chris

941
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies