cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
432
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies

Incorrect route pattern selected

My one location has route patterns out of which one is local,long, international

Wwhen I make 7 digit local calls, it is not using local rp but using long distance inspite of the fact, device CSS has local partition in priority first than long distance

Here is DA for the call.

Can anyone point why it selects long and says local rp as ALTERNATE.

08/20/2008 09:13:46.052 CCM|Digit analysis: match(pi="1", fqcn="3204", cn="3204",plv="5", pss="Part-Fontana-911:Part-Line1:Part-Voicemail:Part-Fontana-Local:Part-Fontana-LongDistance:Part-Fontana-International:Part-Fontana-Internal:Part-Telescams", TodFilteredPss="Part-Fontana-911:Part-Line1:Part-Voicemail:Part-Fontana-Local:Part-Fontana-LongDistance:Part-Fontana-International:Part-Fontana-Internal:Part-Telescams", dd="93228189",dac="1")|<CLID::CCMPUB01-Cluster><NID::10.0.1.3><CT::2,100,119,1.486372><IP::10.0.2.7><DEV::SEP000DED9572AB>

08/20/2008 09:13:46.052 CCM|Digit analysis: analysis results|<CLID::CCMPUB01-Cluster><NID::10.0.1.3><CT::2,100,119,1.486372><IP::10.0.2.7><DEV::SEP000DED9572AB>

08/20/2008 09:13:46.052 CCM||PretransformCallingPartyNumber=3204

|CallingPartyNumber=3204

|DialingPartition=Part-Fontana-LongDistance

|DialingPattern=9.@

|DialingRoutePatternRegularExpression=(9)([2-9][02-9]X)(XXXX)

|DialingWhere=

|PatternType=National

|PotentialMatches=ExclusivelyOffnetPotentialMatchesExist

|DialingSdlProcessId=(0,0,0)

|PretransformDigitString=93228189

|PretransformTagsList=ACCESS-CODE:OFFICE-CODE:SUBSCRIBER

|PretransformPositionalMatchList=9:322:8189

|CollectedDigits=3228189

|UnconsumedDigits=

|TagsList=OFFICE-CODE:SUBSCRIBER

|PositionalMatchList=322:8189

|VoiceMailbox=5189

|VoiceMailCallingSearchSpace=

{

E67375C8-5665-4473-8949-0DAC99129481}

|VoiceMailCallingSearchSpace=Part-Line1:Part-Voicemail:Part-Fontana-LongDistance

|VoiceMailPilotNumber=5099

|AlertingName=

|RouteBlockFlag=RouteThisPattern

|RouteBlockCause=0

|InterceptPartition=

|InterceptPattern=

|InterceptWhere=

|InterceptSdlProcessId=(0,0,0)

|InterceptSsType=0

|InterceptSsKey=0

|OverlapSendingFlagEnabled=0

|WithTags=

|WithValues=

|CallingPartyNumberPi=NotSelected

|ConnectedPartyNumberPi=NotSelected

|CallingPartyNamePi=NotSelected

|ConnectedPartyNamePi=NotSelected

|CallManagerDeviceType=NoDeviceType

|PatternPrecedenceLevel=Routine

|CallableEndPointName=[ED20D4AD-0B98-440C-B14C-5F0E019F5C18]

|PatternNodeId=[709BCDC2-D1BE-49CB-84E7-5A312008D28C]

|AARNeighborhood=[]

|AlternateMatches=

{

|Partition=Part-Fontana-Local

{

<

|RoutePattern=9.[2-9]XXXXXX

|PatternType=Enterprise

|NetworkLocation=OffNet

|CallManagerDeviceType=NoDeviceType

|PatternPrecedenceLevel=PlDefaultOutsideDialtone=

|DeviceOverride=

>

}

}

{

|Partition=Part-Fontana-LongDistance

{

<

|RoutePattern=9.@

|Pattern=(9)([2-9]X[02-9])(XXXX)

|TagsList=ACCESS-CODE:OFFICE-CODE:SUBSCRIBER

|PatternType=National

|NetworkLocation=OffNet

|CallManagerDeviceType=NoDeviceType

|PatternPrecedenceLevel=PlDefaultOutsideDialtone=

|DeviceOverride=

>

}

}

|TranslationPatternDetails=

|OffNetPattern=OffNetOutsideDialtone=

3 Replies 3

Michael Owuor
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi Kadambari,

Closest-match routing is used to determine which route pattern matches the number most closely and the call is routed using that route pattern. Order of partitions in the CSS is only used to break a tie when two or more patterns in different partitions match equally.

The route pattern in the LD partition is 9.@, which includes several patterns, including (9)([2-9]X[02-9])(XXXX) which is a closer match for the dialed number than the route pattern in the local partition, which is 9.[2-9]XXXXXX.

If the route pattern in the local partition should be matched instead, change it from 9.[2-9]XXXXXX to 9.[2-9]x[02-9]XXXX. Since the device CSS has local partition above the long distance partition, the order will break the tie.

Does this help?

Regards,

Michael.

some nice reading material so you understand how this works since +90% of the people think the same way you do about the order of the partitions taking always precedence

Calling Privileges in Unified CM

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/6x/dialplan.html#wp1044276

DNA is pretty useful for this

HTH

java

if this helps, please rate

HTH

java

if this helps, please rate

Guys,

I think I figured this out!

Needed a route filter on 9.@

:)

Thanks!

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: