We are building up IPT(Call Manager ,Unity,Presence) environment in standalone setup with IP address (172.16.1.X ...).
we are using Cisco 3925 POE switch and 2911 Router.
Now ,we need to connect our system to customer network(10.4.X.X) ,but the customer doesn't want to connect our system directly to his network so he suggested to us do Nating to avoid any other network issues.They are provding uplink from their switch to our Router.
They are providing only one IP address from their internal segment ,we need to do Nating in our Router and they will do the same in their system as well.
My question is how the phones will get register to our system , because I guess, we are using one to many IP nating.
I think if we nat one to one IP ,then Phones will register using one of the segment IP address.Also,we have to use phones & jabber on mobile connected to the customer network.
So,how can we acheive the above using only one internal IP address ?
Will that be possible if we use one to one mapping .In that case,we need three IP address so that it will be mapped to IPT devices accordingly,so the phones will register by connecting to one of the internal IP mapped to CUCM.
Doubt it, there are a lot of moving parts in VoiP that NAT will break. SDP, certs etc. You could look at using a CUBE for this and try using Phone proxy on it but phone proxy as I hear it has its own problems since the product is too new.
What model phone? Running SCCP or SIP? Do you have packet captures from both sides of the device doing the NAT? Are you changing the address of CUCM via NAT as well? If so, that won't work due to the TFTP config files not being updated with the new address. You would need something like phone proxy on an ASA to handle that kind of setup and that only works for SCCP phones on pre-8.x CUCM versions.
We are using 7941 ,9971 and DX 850 in our setup.We are using SCCP as well SIP phones and we have configured NAtting in our POC setup router(172.16.1.2)Attached the router configuration for your reference.
I have capture the wire shark traces from the phone and CUCM.
Monitoring Source Port (IP Phone IP Address) - 10.1.1.11
Monitoring Destination Port (PC Port) - 10.1.1.20
CUCM/TFTP IP address - 172.16.1.5 (natted to 10.1.1.15)
Attached the CUCM packet capture logs and wireshark from the PC.Can you please check again and let us know why the phones not registering ?
Like I said before, you can't NAT the CUCM IP address.
What happens is the phones reach out to 10.1.1.15 for TFTP and get this back in the config file:
So now the phones try to register with 172.16.1.5 but they can't reach that address so registration fails. You would need something that could intelligently change those config files. The only thing ever made like that was Phone Proxy on the ASA but it only supported older versions of CUCM and only supported SCCP phones.
IntroductionCUCM Routing RulesDial String implementation PolicyCUCM Routing LogicSIP URI Call Routing Analysis+++ Case Study: 1 ++++++ Case Study: 2 +++Conclusion
Over the last few months, I have had the privilege of working on SI...
Are you getting this error “Installer User Interface Mode Not Supported. The installer cannot run in this UI mode. To specify the interface mode, use the -i command-line option, followed by the UI mode identifier. The value UI mode identifiers...