Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

MGCP vrf aware

I am having problems getting a MGCP gateway to register with CCM (vers7.1.2).

This is down to the network using VRF and the route to the CCM not being found.

I have seen on some old discussions regarding MGCP not being VRF aware, is this still the case ?

If so is there anyway round this problem ?? Still using MGCP.

Many thanks

Billy

  • IP Telephony
4 REPLIES
Cisco Employee

Re: MGCP vrf aware

Yes, still the same. There is an enhancement on that

CSCsg30782   
VRF aware for Backhaul-session-manager BSM and MGCP

We do not have any WA with MGCP, we only suppurt VRF with H323 or SCCP

HTH

java

If this helps, please rate

www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

HTH

java

if this helps, please rate

www.cisco.com/go/pdi
New Member

Re: MGCP vrf aware

Java

Is there any plans to make MGCP vrf aware.

Or are there major technical issues to prevent this.

Billy

Cisco Employee

Re: MGCP vrf aware

I already posted the bug that tracks that enhancement request, no ETA for it.

You can reach your Cisco AM and let them know you're also interested on this so the BU knows there is interest on the feature.

HTH

java

If this helps, please rate

www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

HTH

java

if this helps, please rate

www.cisco.com/go/pdi

Re: MGCP vrf aware

Billy,

I had a deployment a few months ago where we were running MGCP on our WAN edge devices and running VRF.  What we needed to do is put the voice network(s) in the "native" routing instance and move everything else to vrf routing instances.

Since vrf is local to the box and no router outside of the voice gateway was aware of the particulars around the local vrf instances, we were able to achieve the same degree of separation.  In essence, we solved the same requirements with a different configuration approach.

Now this wouldn't be the case if you were running mpls-vpn and the voice gateway was responsible for pushing or popping labels.

Anyway, just a thought.


Regards,
Bill

HTH -Bill (b) http://ucguerrilla.com (t) @ucguerrilla

Please remember to rate helpful responses and identify

987
Views
0
Helpful
4
Replies
This widget could not be displayed.