Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Pro ans Con about MGCP, H323 and SIP

Dear All,

We have a global customer who what to know what ware the advantages/disadvantages or benefits of MGCP, H323 and SIP. baysicaly when is recommended to use one over the other one?

I guess that the IP Networkers with lots of real world experience can give us a good info about the above protocols.

Many thanks in advance,

Regards,

Maddox

2 REPLIES
Blue

Re: Pro ans Con about MGCP, H323 and SIP

Maddox,

Here is a H323 to MGCP comparison:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk1077/technologies_tech_note09186a00806fedbe.shtml

MGCP places most of the control in Call Manager with relatively dumb endpoints. This makes for easier configuration, and better tracking of calls (CDR).

H323 and SIP place more intelligence in the endponts, and also provide for higher degree of interoperability with other vendors. Most in the industry agree that SIP will eventually be the dominant protocol.

Please rate helpful posts.

Dave

New Member

Re: Pro ans Con about MGCP, H323 and SIP

Dave,

The link you had provided doesn't provide enough info I am looking for.

As you probabily know,

the fundamental difference is that peer-to-peer protocols such as H.323 and SIP tend to scale more gracefully, but client/server protocols such as MGCP are easier to design and maintain.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk1330/tsd_technology_support_technical_reference_chapter09186a008075979c.html#wp1021960

Also I agree with you, SIP is the future, till then we have to deal with H323 or MGCP.

Regards,

Maddox

680
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies