Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

QSIG MGCP to H323

Hi,

this is the situation.

MGCP:

1 PRI DMS-100 to PSTN

1 PRI QSIG to PBX (for internal call 1-7 xxx)

When I change the MGCP to H323.

PRI over PSTN, works fine

PRI for the PBX, doesn't works.

If I call from Cisco, no problem except the hangup (doesn't work). If I call from the PBX, sometime work with a delay (2-3 secondes).

I attach the config MGCP and H323.

Can you help me??

Thanks!

Martin

4 REPLIES
New Member

Re: QSIG MGCP to H323

Does not work means?

1.- Both PRI Layer 1 are down?

2.- Both Pri layer 2 are down?

3.- Layer 1 and 2 are up but no calls go through?

New Member

Re: QSIG MGCP to H323

2 PRI are up (lawer 1 and 2)

The PRI for the PSTN, I can make and receive many call, no problem with this part.

For the PRI to the PBX... I attach the debug

New Member

Re: QSIG MGCP to H323

You have a call loop.....

New Member

Re: QSIG MGCP to H323

Thanks. Other question...

I have extension 3xxx on my CCM and my PBX have 3xxx, 1-7xxx over PRI 0/0/1 and PSTN (for external call) on my PRI 0/0/0. I have difficult with my dial-peer. This is my last try. When I call from the PBX and PSTN I receive the dial tone.

dial-peer voice 4000 voip

destination-pattern ....

session target ipv4:172.27.2.10

dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric

codec g711ulaw

!

dial-peer voice 1 pots

destination-pattern [4-5].........

direct-inward-dial

port 0/0/0:23

forward-digits 10

!

dial-peer voice 2 pots

destination-pattern 1[2-8].........

direct-inward-dial

port 0/0/0:23

forward-digits 11

!

dial-peer voice 3 pots

destination-pattern 011T

direct-inward-dial

port 0/0/0:23

forward-digits 12

!

dial-peer voice 4 pots

destination-pattern [1-7]...

direct-inward-dial

port 0/0/1:23

forward-digits 4

Thanks!

Martin

253
Views
0
Helpful
4
Replies