Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
New Member

Unable to register both BRI ports of C887VA-V using MGCP (Bug : CSCuj54849)

Hi !

Does anyone know if this issue has ben solved in CUCM V10 ?

Thank you,

Regards,

Christian.

2 ACCEPTED SOLUTIONS

Accepted Solutions
Green

Christian,The bug is still in

Christian,

The bug is still in an OPEN status.

It states that the known affected releases are only CUCM8.6.2xxx.

 

You should raise a TAC and tell them that the bug is also affecting your CUCM Ver/Release

They say the workaround is to use H323

 

Hope this helps

Regards

Alex

Regards, Alex. Please rate useful posts.

Hi Christian,The workaround

Hi Christian,

The workaround in place is to you use the gateway as H.323.

if you do land opening a ticket with TAC, the same solution will be given for the bug you posted.

As of now the bug has not been resolved on CUCM 10 and is being worked on i believe.

So eventually you'll have to wait for a update for fix in the next release on the CUCM.

 

Rate the post accordingly.

 

Regards,

Kevin

4 REPLIES
Green

Christian,The bug is still in

Christian,

The bug is still in an OPEN status.

It states that the known affected releases are only CUCM8.6.2xxx.

 

You should raise a TAC and tell them that the bug is also affecting your CUCM Ver/Release

They say the workaround is to use H323

 

Hope this helps

Regards

Alex

Regards, Alex. Please rate useful posts.
New Member

Hi folks !I have already

Hi folks !
I have already created a case with TAC and your answers are accurate. It seems obvious that Cisco has other priorities than developing a "small" router in the CUCM environment!

Regards.
Christian.

Hi Christian,The workaround

Hi Christian,

The workaround in place is to you use the gateway as H.323.

if you do land opening a ticket with TAC, the same solution will be given for the bug you posted.

As of now the bug has not been resolved on CUCM 10 and is being worked on i believe.

So eventually you'll have to wait for a update for fix in the next release on the CUCM.

 

Rate the post accordingly.

 

Regards,

Kevin

New Member

Hi folks !I have already

Hi folks !
I have already created a case with TAC and your answers are accurate. It seems obvious that Cisco has other priorities than developing a "small" router in the CUCM environment!

Regards.
Christian.

59
Views
0
Helpful
4
Replies
CreatePlease to create content