05-28-2008 07:25 AM - edited 03-15-2019 10:55 AM
We're trying to narrow down the pros and cons about these two products.
For an enterprise redundant design, which solution you would/would not prefer and why?
Thanks for your comments/inputs in advance.
05-28-2008 07:29 AM
Unity Conn does not have failover yet.
The amount of subscribers to which you can scale to on both products are diff. (Unity is as high as 7500).
05-28-2008 07:35 AM
Thanks for the quick response.
05-28-2008 07:29 AM
Here's a good link to the Feature Comparison Matrix. A good place to start.
Regards,
Michael.
05-28-2008 07:36 AM
Thanks for the quick response. This was very good.
05-28-2008 07:43 AM
Hey Guys,
The feature sets are getting closer and closer with Unity and UC. This doc nicely encapsulates some of the differences. UC is not integrated with Exchange but can currently support up to 7,500 users (and this number is increasing - see below) Also, UC 7.0 supports Active-Active redundancy;
Cisco Unified Messaging Feature Comparison
Have a look at what is coming down the pipe for both systems:)
Unified Communications Applications: Unity Connection 7.0 EFT Opportunity
Unified Communications Applications: Unity 7.0 EFT Opportunity
Hope this helps!
Rob
05-28-2008 08:31 AM
Hello Again,
Where can get brief feature discriptions for the comparison page below?
The following are some of the topics that I would like to get a little bit info on.
Enterprise Deployment:
System networking/VPIM/AMIS/unityBridge
Telephone Environments:
Serial/Analog Integration
Security:
RSA Securre-ID 2-factor one-tiem PIN authentication interface
Call Transfer Feature:
Tranfer to Alternate contact num.
Administration:
Custom Key Mapping/Hospitality Integration
Fax:
Thanks again.
Fureya
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide