Looking for some feedback on the following scenario:
We have a two switch stack where each switch is connected to each of 2 firewalls so that if one firewall or one switch fails, we don't lose our connectivity to the other end of the link (a matching 2 switch stack with routers attached). What we would like to be able to do is upgrade code on one stack member at a time so that we don't lose the entire link. If I have read the documentation correctly, if we do this, the stack will come back up with a version mismatch and will attempt to then auto upgrade the other switch. What I'm wondering is how the individual switches function while there is a version mismatch. For example, we will have a portchannel setup with a link on each switch going to the other 2 switch stack on the other end. Will traffic continue to flow across the port channel correctly while the stack is in version mismatch? Also, will traffic still flow between member switches in the stack.
Hopefully somebody has a stack where they need at least one member to be up at all times. If there isn't a way to do this, we'll just set the switches up individually but the shared management is a nice feature that we would like to take advantage of if possible.
[toc:faq]The ProblemOn traditional switches whenever we have a trunk
interface we use the VLAN tag to demultiplex the VLANs. The switch needs
to determine which MAC Address table to look in for a forwarding
decision. To do this we require the switch to do...
[toc:faq]Introduction:Netdr is a tool available on a RSP720, Sup720 or
Sup32 that allows one to capture packets on the RP or SP inband. The
netdr command can be used to capture both Tx and Rx packets in the
software switching path. This is not a substitut...
IntroductionOSPF, being a link-state protocol, allows for every router
in the network to know of every link and OSPF speaker in the entire
network. From this picture each router independently runs the Shortest
Path First (SPF) algorithm to determine the b...