Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

/31 mask a good idea?

Is anyone using a /31 mask on point to point links or uplinks between layer 3 switches? Is there any downside or gotchas? I'm planning on running layer 3 all the way to my access switches and using routed ports to connect the access to the distribution. A /31 mask would help conserve ip addresses, right?

thanks

8 REPLIES
Silver

Re: /31 mask a good idea?

Hi There

To the best of my knowledge a /31 netmask is not possible.

The smallest subnet possible is a /30 which yields 2 usable IP addresses along with the broadcast address of the subnet and the subnet number. This is what is recommended for a point to point link.

I think I remember reading somewhere about an RFC that was in the experimental stage which would allow a /31 mask (though I may be dreaming), but I have never heard of it being released for use.

I have seen instances where errors were made in configurations and either the subnet mask or the subnet number was assigned to a host and it appeared to work, but I think that this would be frowned upon in a live production network.

Best Regards,

Michael

Cisco Employee

Re: /31 mask a good idea?

Michael,

The draft you are referring to was draft-retana-31bits and made it into RFC3021 and has been supported in IOS since 12.2T.

Please refer to the following document for more information on RFC3021:

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3021.txt

Regards,

Harold Ritter
Sr. Technical Leader
CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP)
harold@cisco.com
México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915
Cisco México 
Paseo de la Reforma 222 Piso 19
Cuauhtémoc, Juárez
Ciudad de México, 06600
México
New Member

Re: /31 mask a good idea?

I will admit its new, but here is a link that talks about it. I'm more curious than anything,because I thought /30 was the smallest.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t2/feature/guide/ft31addr.html

Re: /31 mask a good idea?

While you are correct it can be done does it make it a "good idea".....Just because I could pierce my tongue 100 times does not mean it is a "good idea" :-)

Unless you have a shortage of IP addresses I would not introduce this.... just my Half-Penny (was two-cents but you know with the economy and gas prices).

Mike

New Member

Re: /31 mask a good idea?

/31s are awesome. it saves IP space! The problem is its not interroperable with other vendors. Works on newer code.

New Member

Re: /31 mask a good idea?

saves IP space... if you're using it internally you more than likely have enough space anyway :P

Super Bronze

Re: /31 mask a good idea?

Possibly another alternative, for saving your address space, would be usage of IP unnumbered. See http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk362/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094e8d.shtml for more information.

New Member

Re: /31 mask a good idea?

thanks everyone for letting me know what you think. I'm going to try the /31 in a test environment and see if I like it. I am on a lan and do have plenty of addresses and of course, we're an all Cisco shop, so interoperability won't be a problem.

thanks again

952
Views
5
Helpful
8
Replies
CreatePlease login to create content