LaCP - advantages are that both switches will make the determination whether the other end is capable of channeling. to me that is an advantage since with "on", it just forces the channel to on, they could very well be NOT channeling but with "on" they will be froced to channel. without any other protection this could cause some issues such as STP loop, instability with the packet switching, etc.
The advantage with "on" is it's simple to implement. Channel protocol independent, if the other end is not LaCP capable then "on" is a good option.
I have done some tests using VSS and a 3750 MEC. And my conclusion was that LACP or PAGP were actually better than mode "on". Why ?
I discovered that when a link recovered, one of the two sides could be faster to bring up the link. The switch that would be "first" immediately starts forwarding packets across the new link, while the other side might not yet be ready with joining the link to the etherchannel. (i am talking about 0.5-1.5 seconds packet loss here).
Using LACP or Pagp negotiation, the link is only being activated AFTER BOTH sides have negotiated and are READY to forward packets. So using LACP/PAGP, i lost 0 packets !
Second, i once experienced an outage caused by "mode on". for example, if you configure one side of a link for "mode on", and you forget to configure the other side (or connect the fiber to the wrong interface :-), the portchannel WILL come up on the "mode on" side. This bringing up of the portchannel will bring up the vlans and will start forwarding vlan traffic. However, because the other side is wrongly connected or configured, the traffic will be black-holed. Add some CEF load-balancing to the question, and you will arrive in situation where half of your pings could be dropped (something like: .!.!.!.!.!.!
When you force on a etherchannel will show on if there is a physical link whether the etherchannel is working or not , this is true also when you force on a trunk . Both of what you said is true and it warns in some cisco docs about blackholeing of traffic in misconfigured "on" modes . We generally use negotiated etherchannels and trunks , everyone has their own opinion on this which is better.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...