I'd like to get everyone's thoughts on a design type question.
I currently have two 3750s acting as core switches aggregating 15-20 other access switches throughout the domain. These are NOT stacked today...they have an etherchannel between them. This is a single flat vlan today.
Within the next few days, I'll be segmenting the newtork, enabling dot1q trunking on all uplinks, etc.
My main question is around HA, STP, and uplink configuration.
Do I want to remain having two separate 3750s having one of the uplinks blocked by STP OR configure the switches for Stacking and take advantage of the active/active uplinks withi cross stack EC, OR stack but with STP still blocking one of the uplinks. I suppose it comes down to what level of redunancy is better? Two physically separate 3750s, two stacked, or are they the same in your perspective. Any software defects when stacking that could cause problems?
If both switches are in the same Rack then there is no justification to Uplink them. By Stcking you will get much more control and easier to manage. If one of them fails the secind one takes over with minimum intruption. Further more say If you are currently uplinking all 4 Gigabit ports using Ether-Channels, you are getting 4 Gig aggr but if you use stacking instead you will get 32G backplane. On top of this you have no STP between them as both switches work like a single switch when you stack them.
Thanks for the replies, but the only reason I'm posiing this question is I've seen problems affect an entire stack with other vendors solutions. I am familiar with the bw, stp, and other benefits...just want to make sure I'm not essentially creating a single point of failure.
Jaye, be careful. If you Stack the switches together you will be forced to use cross-stack etherchannel into the stack. The 3750s are not designed to aggregate this much etherchannel uplink. I know this from experience. I once tried to aggregate 20 access switches into a 6 stack 3750g Distribution switch and the performance was lousy. Some etherchannels would just not form and caused weird errors. I notified Cisco TAc and they werent able to fix the problem stating that I need to upgrade to 6500's which I did and problems were solved.
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...