We have some 500 switches connected to cisco 4507 as L2 Tier-1 Aggregator. I am frequently facing problem of Topology change Notifications.
The Entire network is geographically separated point to point star network without any redundant paths. After enabling Edge port on all the 500 switches the topology change is very much in control but still it is there.
Is there any method that we can divide this network without putting any L3 device so that topology change will be limited to that particular small part of network
MST is running on Cisco 4507 and remaining RSTP on remaining all switches
On your access switches make sure you have spanning tree portfast turned on for all user ports otherwise everytime a user comes on the air you will see a TCN . If your connecting links are stable you should see very few TCN"s.TCN's are not a bad thing as long as you are not getting a ton of them , if so you have a problem somewhere .
I totally agree on what u r saying.. and i know that TCN is important...
What i am looking for is some solution where i can divide this into 5-10 parts so as if one part is affected others should not.
Can i get this kind of division by implementing 5-10 different MST instances on 4507...Because as per my understanding the MST instances are configured vlan wise..Is there any method to configure per port wise....where i can map as set of ports say 5/1 to 5/24 in one MST instance and 5/25 to 5/48 in another MST instance.
Generally it is stable only...But the problem comes when link towards one or two sites fluctuates. As i told all the other sites are connected to geographically different locations thorugh Ethernet over SDH/SONET
So during during those problematic hours TCN reaches nearly one minute and CPU utilization also goes high as It has to rebuild a mac table of 25K
This document gives several answers on frequently asked questions for PFRv3 channel state behavior.
Q1: What are all the channel operational states from a BR (border role) perspective and what are the rules/conditions to be in each st...
The need was to reach an host inside a LAN through a VPN connection managed by the LAN gateway (Cisco 1921).
The LAN gateway performs NAT and there was a dedicate nat rule for the host i wanted to reach through VPN.
I couldn't connect to the hos...
We have 3 identical switches configured by someone else and would like to claim some of the Gigabit ports(G1/G2/G3/G4) for use on servers. When we try to change the wiring and configuration, we run in to connectivity issues. Attached is a des...