I have 2 6500 in hsrp and fwsm in failover. OSPF is enabled on both 6500. 6500 receive routes from fwsm with ospf. Fwsm has some static routes. Only one of the 2 6500 shows these routes when I write sh ip route. There are not any problems with routes announced by routers which are in a vlan of fwsm. In running config, there are not differences about ospf process.
O E2 10.3.0.0/16 [110/1] via 10.x.x.x, 01:43:36, VlanY
On 6500_2 I have
O E2 10.1.0.0/16 [110/20] via 10.x.x.x, 01:46:18, VlanY
O E2 10.2.0.0/16 [110/20] via 10.x.x.x, 01:46:18, VlanY
O E2 10.3.0.0/16 [95/537600] via 10.x.x.x, 6d22h, VlanY
If I don't insert the 2 static routes, 6500_1 doesn't know how to route packets directed to 10.1.0.0 or 10.2.0.0. My question is: why 6500_1 doesn't learn routes from fwsm?(there are 2 static routes on fwsm for 10.1.0.0 and 10.2.0.0). Route for 10.3.0.0 is announced by a router on a vlan of fwsm.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...