I have "maximum-paths" configured and seeing two entries in the RIB for remote prefixes at the hub core 6500 (it has two EBGP connections to two CE from 2 carriers each).
The remote site has 2 CE routers connected to two carriers, one carrier each, and seeing the same as-path length for the hub routes. The remote LAN switch has two equal EIGRP routes for the hub prefixes.
However the remote is only using one carrier for inbound traffic, doesn't doing the load-sharing.
I think the problem could be due to hub 6500 CEF is doing per-destination sharing and won't switch to another EBGP peer unless we reset the EBGP peer with the best route... Is it a correct assumption?
Can 6500 do the per-packet load-share? I don't see this option under interface?
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.