Advantages of using full mesh im core/distribution layer when not using VSS?
full mesh is recommended in several network design guides also when not using VSS/VPC.
E.g. Cisco Borderless Campus 1.0 Design Guide and Enterprise Campus 3.0 Architecture Guide:
"As a general best practice to build resilient network designs, it is highly recommended to interconnect all network systems with full-mesh diverse physical paths. This network design automatically creates multiple parallel paths to provide load-sharing capabilities and path redundancy during network fault events. Deploying a single physical connection from any standalone campus system to separate redundant upstream systems creates a “triangle”-shaped physical network design that is an optimal and redundant design, in contrast to the non-recommended partial-mesh “square” physical network design."
Does anyone know why exactly square is not recommended and what are the essential benefits of full mesh next to load-sharing?
We did not found any further information in cco concerning this.
[toc:faq]The ProblemOn traditional switches whenever we have a trunk
interface we use the VLAN tag to demultiplex the VLANs. The switch needs
to determine which MAC Address table to look in for a forwarding
decision. To do this we require the switch to do...
[toc:faq]Introduction:Netdr is a tool available on a RSP720, Sup720 or
Sup32 that allows one to capture packets on the RP or SP inband. The
netdr command can be used to capture both Tx and Rx packets in the
software switching path. This is not a substitut...
IntroductionOSPF, being a link-state protocol, allows for every router
in the network to know of every link and OSPF speaker in the entire
network. From this picture each router independently runs the Shortest
Path First (SPF) algorithm to determine the b...