Interface 2 is intended to have 3 subnets : 10.1.0.x,10.2.0.x,10.3.0.x
SNAT rules are in place for each of the subnets to have traffic to the 192.168.x.x. IPs on int2 as well as reciprocal rules from int1.
Same security level trafic is enabled between interfaces and if I set the devices to 10.0.0.x addressing, versus the subnet10.1.x.x, traffic flows fine. It appears tha for some reason it is not possible to have multiple subnets communicating.
I have tried creating all shapes and forms of dynamic as well as exempt rules in the NAT tables.
The packet testing shows that flow is good and should be working, but there is actually no traffic.
At this point I have xhausted my knowledge base and would like to ask how this should be findamentally configured.
You feedback is immensely appreciated. My apologies if this isn't the right forum to post in, but I felt it was appropriate due to it being a routing issue.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.