Authorization behavior between a network device and TACACS+ server
I have a question concerning AAA communication. In my scenario client switch is configured via AAA to communicate with a TACACS+ server. Generally speaking as a user logs into the device authentication takes place. During authorization the privilege level is validated for the user to provide them with the associated commands allowed for that privilege level. My question is, when a command is executed on the switch by said user, does it have to validate that command/privilege level directly with the TACACS+ server each time a new command is issued or during the authorization process is a user profile supplied to the switch with it's privilege level from the TACACS+ server and stored in memory temporarily until the user connection is dissolved, keeping those validations local instead of traversing the network each time a command is executed at the switch level?
Authorization behavior between a network device and TACACS+ serv
If you are doing command-authorization through TACACS+, then every command has to be authorized individually. So authorization on TACACS+ is very different from Authorization with RADIUS where the Authorization-attributes are completely sent with the Authentication-Reply.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.