I must connect two Cisco 7606 with two Cisco Catalyst 4506 at level 2 only. The final topology is a square. The Catalyst 4506 are connected to three routers in dual-homing and have a Port-Channel between them. When I connect the 4506 to the 7606 I have to transport a VLAN only so the trunk is not needed. I'd like to avoid the spanning tree timer calculation when I plug the cable because the router are in a live network and I'm scared to lost traffic.
I thought to configure the port connected to the router with span tree portfast and remove the vlan from the trunk back-to-back. Is that a good idea or exist other better solutions?
Hi I add the complete topology. The port connected between 4506 and router are in Access mode and between the 4506 there is an EtherChannel. I might decide how to configure the port connected between the 4506 and 7606 and how to decrease the spanning tree calculation problem when I plug the cables
Well the best of this would be configure the ports as L3 ports to bring them up immediately. You can run a routing protocol and you have auto-matic load-balancing with redundancy/Fail-over for you in the network.
good thing but i cannot because the 7600, in the future, will became a LAN aggregator with routers directly connect to it without the Catalyst 4506. The Catalyst 4506 remains only for a transitory period
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.