Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

basic outputdrop cat4500 sup6-e

hello,

on a cat4500 sup6-e switch with WS-X4648-RJ45V-E card,

we have some output drops (giga and so 100M speed's interfaces).

the default number of output queue is 40.

Can we rise to 50 (or 60) ?

is there a commande like the 'hold-queue' one ?

I know that speed adtation between Giga links and 100M link can be an issue.

The flow dropped isn't yet find/known.

sh int gi 2/21

...

Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, link type is auto, media type is 10/100/1000-TX

....

Input queue: 0/2000/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 224019085

Queueing strategy: fifo

Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)

....

Regards,

8 REPLIES
New Member

Re: basic outputdrop cat4500 sup6-e

you can try set both side hard-code full duplex/100M , do not use auto

New Member

Re: basic outputdrop cat4500 sup6-e

Hello,

it doesn't seem to be a duplex mismatch.

The drops increase meanly in the morning and in the afternoon.

rehards,

J.David

Re: basic outputdrop cat4500 sup6-e

Hello David

Output drops are just due to congestion or sudden burst of traffic on that interface, and the outgoing interface cannot accept all packets that should be sent out. Easiest way to avoid output drops, is to increase the line speed.. since it isnt a duplex issue, i dont see any other means by which you can control this, except applying QOS..

queue size can be changed, but it isnt really recommended, as it can timeout geniune tcp handshakes.. This is what I found on CCO:

"Never increase the output queue in an attempt to prevent output drops. If packets stay too long in the output queue, TCP timers can expire and trigger retransmission. Retransmitted packets only congest the outgoing interface even more."

Give it a shot with QOS, if you have the matrix of applications on the network..

Hope this helps.. all the best.. rate replies if found useful.

Raj

New Member

Re: basic outputdrop cat4500 sup6-e

hello,

Raj,

We do not have the matrix of applications on the network, so QoS can't be used.

Increase of line speed can't be done at the moment.

Some links are connected to servers with giga links. Maybe we can try using the flowcontrol options.

Some others links are connected to cat3750 and cat2950 or cat2960 but flowncontrol seems to not bee available (I have to check this anyway).

In the mean time how can we increase those buffers ? I known that this is not recommended.

Regards,

J-David

Re: basic outputdrop cat4500 sup6-e

Hello David

To limit the size of the IP output queue on an interface, use the hold-queue command in interface configuration mode. To restore the default values, use the no form of this command.

hold-queue length {in | out}

out specifies the output queue.. The default is 40 packets. For asynchronous interfaces, the default is 10 packets.

Hope this helps.. all the best.

Raj

New Member

Re: basic outputdrop cat4500 sup6-e

hello Raj,

in fact this command seems to not be available on this cat4500 because of the supervisory or the line card (or because it is a switch ?).

I'll have a look too at the "flowcontrol" feature if this can be used on some link giga (to some servers).

We have some cat3750 connected to the cat4500, but the used of the flowcontrol feature seems to not be good as the cat3750 can't send pause frame.

Regards,

J.David

Re: basic outputdrop cat4500 sup6-e

David

I think flowcontrol is an option for receive buffer, and not output queues.. ill have to check more on this... you need to enable it both the ends, to make sure the switch sends pause frames to the opposite switch when the receive buffer becomes full.. are you also seeing input queue drops on the interface?

Hope this helps.

Raj

Super Bronze

Re: basic outputdrop cat4500 sup6-e

"is there a commande like the 'hold-queue' one ? "

For a 6E and 12.2(44)SG (or later), the answer appears to be yes.

See: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.2/52sg/command/reference/int_sess.html#wp2339887

PS:

Regarding Raj's Cisco quote (from http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps133/products_tech_note09186a0080094791.shtml ?), I don't agree with Cisco's statement (I believe it's an over simplification), but increasing queue depth, when dealing with oversubscription, is often counter productive. You might want to try DBL.

668
Views
0
Helpful
8
Replies
CreatePlease to create content