Now studing for the BCMSN with the CiscoPress BCMSN Vol. 4 pg. 187 Figure8-2.
My question refers to a scenario where PC1 is connected to 2 switches for redundancy and forwarding a frame to the PC4 on the other side.
I understand the concept of a switching loop ...but this has me hung up.
It says "lets assume that both switches know the mac address both of the PCs in question. It then states that "both switches will receive the frame on their incoming ports". Then it will forward the frames on to PC4 and PC4 will receive both frames. It states "this is not ideal, but not disasterous either".
Question 1 : How/Where did the frame get duplicated? (the frame is received on both incoming switch interfaces)
So... In essencse it is NOT received on both switch interfaces. It is a broadcast that initiates the other switch to add the MAC to the CAM table. Thus example why you need STP.
The way the book states it the PC sends the frame then it "is received on both interfaces of the switches". This leads you to believe that the frame was "duplicated" somewhere because the next paragraph says "PC4 receives both frames".
the two switches can receive the frame both: imagine that the pc is connected to a hub (the lan segment) and then the hub is connected to two ports one on switch1 and the second on switch2.
Then the two switches send out on the other network segment where again PC4 is connected to a hub anf then the hub is connected to two ports one of each switch.
The two switches don't speak STP and don't know of each other.
If you add this to the example it should like more reasonable.
By the way, Unkwown unicast MAC addresses are sent out all ports in the same vlan without any change to the frame (with the exception of the one where the frame is received) this is also known as unknown unicast flooding.
It is treated like a broadcast but it isn't a broadcast.
As soon as someone starts to send out frames with a MAC source equal to the unknown one, the association is built and all other frames with this destination are not flooded anymore but sent to the port where the station is.
We have 3 identical switches configured by someone else and would like to claim some of the Gigabit ports(G1/G2/G3/G4) for use on servers. When we try to change the wiring and configuration, we run in to connectivity issues. Attached is a des...
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...