Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

CAB-HD8-ASYNC Versus CAB-OCTAL-ASYNC

The Question is so simple: Is the CAB-HD8-ASYNC cable a rolled cable just like the CAB-OCTAL-ASYNC cable - or not!. I simply cannot find the answer (or pinouts) of the CAB-HD8-ASYNC).

Thanks

Johnny

3 REPLIES
Bronze

Re: CAB-HD8-ASYNC Versus CAB-OCTAL-ASYNC

They look the same. Stonewall cable is an excellent 3rd party cable supplier. They have them listed both as RS-232, 68 pin, RJ45. I would give them a call and ask their engineering dept.

http://www.stonewallcable.com/product.asp?dept_id=144&pf_id=SC-3727

http://www.stonewallcable.com/product.asp?dept%5Fid=114&pf%5Fid=SC%2D9554%2DT

New Member

Re: CAB-HD8-ASYNC Versus CAB-OCTAL-ASYNC

Hi and thanks for your reply. I think, though, that they may have done a little too much copy and paste. 'HD' in CAB-HD8-ASYNC' is supposed to mean 'High Density'. And this means another 'footprint' than the CAB-OCTAL-ASYNC cable, in my understading of it. Ok, I can live with that. However, I really need to know if this CAB-HD8-ASYNC cable (for the HWIC-xxA modules) is 'rolled' like the older one for the NM-xx modules (CAB-OCTAL-ASYNC).

Or not 'rolled' - e.g. for connection of other console interfaces than Cisco (and compatibles like Nokia consoles).

Thanks

Johnny

New Member

CAB-HD8-ASYNC Versus CAB-OCTAL-ASYNC

It is designed to go from Cisco terminal servers to other Cisco gear, so maintains the same pinout as the CAB-OCTAL-ASYNC.  Any existing RJ-45 to console adapters you have for the older octal cables should continue to work with the HD octals.

Good luck,

Sean

1988
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies