I have a network I do not expect to exceed 750 devices. Would the 4507 be appropriate for that number of devices. 10 closets will feed back via fiber, all in differnet vlans, to access email/file servers/proprietary programs on a separate vlan. Collapsed core design would be in use. Just wondering if anyone else has used the 4500 series switch at the distribution/core layer with that number of devices connected.
The 4507 can serve Up to 384 FastEthernet or Gigabit Ethernet ports, i don't think that a single one would provide you with the port density required, while the 6500 can have up to 1,152 10/100 ports, 577 10/100/1000 ports.
Port Density would not be an issue for me. Just concerned about the inter-vlan routing speed, and then the switching of traffic to other locations. All closets would feed this switch via fiber uplink, 12 at the moment. Each one in it's own vlan. I would then use static routes on the switch to send any traffic not going to another internal vlan, to point to the firewall, remote sites, etc..
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.