I have a PIX 506e and needed multiple vlans to separate internal traffic. So i purchased a 181 if I use F0 connected to the inside interface of the PIX it will not forward traffic unless I enable NAT. Can this router work in this scenario? I just want it to route traffic, no nat, no firewall, no pat. I was using 10.100.1.0 subnet between devices.
Does the router config look correct to pass all traffic to the FE0 interface? I just want all non internal traffic 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.20.0/24 to be routed out 10.100.1.2. This does not seem to be working.
This document gives several answers on frequently asked questions for PFRv3 channel state behavior.
Q1: What are all the channel operational states from a BR (border role) perspective and what are the rules/conditions to be in each st...
The need was to reach an host inside a LAN through a VPN connection managed by the LAN gateway (Cisco 1921).
The LAN gateway performs NAT and there was a dedicate nat rule for the host i wanted to reach through VPN.
I couldn't connect to the hos...
We have 3 identical switches configured by someone else and would like to claim some of the Gigabit ports(G1/G2/G3/G4) for use on servers. When we try to change the wiring and configuration, we run in to connectivity issues. Attached is a des...