Cisco Support Community
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Cisco 7606 - PortChannel - Service Instance - Single VLAN - /30


 I wonder if there is some way to balance traffic between a PortChannel with 2 channels of 10G and a single vlan with a prefix / 30 using service instance? 

 I ask this because I'm now a PortChannel between 2 routers using service instance on a single vlan, this vlan is responsible for various transport EoMPLS, I have done experiments using the system load-balance weigthed and it still fails, the channels are configured as passive as below: 

 interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1
 mtu 9216
 no ip address
 ip flow ingress
 history BPS
 mls netflow sampling
 storm-control broadcast level 10.00
 storm-control multicast level 10.00
 channel-group 1 mode passive link 1

interface TenGigabitEthernet1/2
 mtu 9216
 no ip address
 history BPS
 mls netflow sampling
 storm-control broadcast level 10.00
 storm-control multicast level 10.00
 channel-group 1 mode passive link 2

interface Port-channel1
 mtu 9216
 no ip address
 no ip unreachables
 no ip proxy-arp
 ip flow ingress
 mls netflow sampling
 storm-control broadcast level 10.00
 storm-control multicast level 10.00
 no keepalive
 port-channel load-balance link 1
  service-instance 530
 port-channel load-balance weighted link 2
 port-channel load-balance weighted rebalance disable
 port-channel port hash-distribution fixed
 lacp fast-switchover
 lacp direct-loadswap
 hold-queue 4096 in
 hold-queue 4096 out
 l2protocol peer lacp
service instance 530 ethernet
  encapsulation dot1q 530
  rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
  bridge-domain 530

show ethernet service instance load-balance 
Weighted Load-Balancing Status for Port-channel1
 Rebalancing Status
  Current memberlink weight deviation from mean: 0
  Deviation after rebalancing: 0
  Automatic rebalance threshold: Disabled

 Link ID 2: TenGigabitEthernet1/2
  Total weight assigned to memberlink: 62
  Weight from manual load-balancing: 0
  Service instances: 1420-1421,1424-1427,1440,1549,3352-3353,3450,3461,3463
  Service instances: 3485,3493-3494,3660-3661,3664,3932,3954,3963,4007

Manually Assigned Load-Balancing Status for Port-channel1

 Link ID 1: TenGigabitEthernet1/1 (Active)
  Service instances: 530


show etherchannel port-channel   

        Channel-group listing: 



Group: 1 


        Port-channels in the group: 



Port-channel: Po1    (Primary Aggregator)




Age of the Port-channel   = 29d:13h:16m:53s

Logical slot/port   = 14/1          Number of ports = 2

HotStandBy port = null 

Passive port list   = Te1/1 Te1/2 

Port state          = Port-channel L3-Ag Ag-Inuse 

Protocol            =   LACP

Fast-switchover     = enabled

Direct Load Swap    = enabled


Ports in the Port-channel: 


Index   Load    Port      EC state        No of bits


  0     55     Te1/1      Passive            4

  1     AA     Te1/2      Passive            4


Time since last port bundled:    0d:05h:02m:47s    Te1/1

Time since last port Un-bundled: 0d:05h:02m:51s    Te1/1


show etherchannel load-balance

EtherChannel Load-Balancing Configuration:

        src-dst-mixed-ip-port vlan included

        mpls label-ip


EtherChannel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:

Non-IP: Source XOR Destination MAC address

  IPv4: Source XOR Destination IP address and TCP/UDP (layer-4) port number

  IPv6: Source XOR Destination IP address

  MPLS: Label or IP


The services instances that are different of the 530 are only MPLS transport that travels on vlan 530, but TX traffic goes some only interface in a PortChannel.

 the question is whether there is any way to make traffic stay balanced across the two interfaces since the src / dst ip is the same.

 follows a brief topology


 me3600 (switchport configuration) 2x10G ======== 7606 (service instance configuration).