Another enterprise needs to comunicate with a server of my enterprise, only one.
I use access list in my routers and they haven't route to can connect to my server(no routing protocols). His network and my network connects using an intermediate network(10.10.10.0/24) but is not the network of my server. The ip of my router is 10.10.10.10
My server is 192.168.5.6. What is the most common in this scenario?
They add a route 192.168.5.6 255.255.255.255 10.10.10.10 or 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.10
I think the best is add a route with 32 bits prefix but i want to know your opinion.
This document gives several answers on frequently asked questions for PFRv3 channel state behavior.
Q1: What are all the channel operational states from a BR (border role) perspective and what are the rules/conditions to be in each st...
The need was to reach an host inside a LAN through a VPN connection managed by the LAN gateway (Cisco 1921).
The LAN gateway performs NAT and there was a dedicate nat rule for the host i wanted to reach through VPN.
I couldn't connect to the hos...