11-04-2013 05:11 PM - edited 03-07-2019 04:25 PM
Hi Everyone,
I did test below at my home lab.
Access layer switch connects to the distribution layer switch.
Default gateway of Access layer is distribution switch.
Distribution switch rapid-pvst
Access layer mst
Both distribution and access layer are running different spanning tree mode protocols.
When they do this then access switch is unable to ping its default gateway and access switch port that is trunk to distribution switch it is in bKN state.
Need to know when spanning tree mode is different between two connected switches does this mean that they are speaking different language and they
can not talk to each other completely?
Regards
MAhesh
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-04-2013 05:38 PM
Yes, PVST runs STP instances for each vlans & MST running stp instace for a group of vlans. So your two different switches STP communication won't be understand by each other.
Following two post are very good reference if you interesting to go for details.
1. http://blog.ine.com/2008/07/27/mstp-tutorial-part-i-inside-a-region/
2. http://blog.ine.com/2008/09/24/mstp-tutorial-part-ii-outside-a-region/
HTH
Rasika
*** Pls rate all useful responses ***
11-04-2013 10:10 PM
Hi Mahesh,
When a MST running switch connects to another switch that is running PVST+ (or Rapid) then the boundary port (that connects to the non MST region) runs something called PVST simulation. This is needed so that the two different domains can understand each other and a common spanning tree can be built for your entire layer 2 topology.
Having said that, PVST simulation works with very specific rules. Failure to adhere to these rules will lead to the port being blocked due to PVST simulation failure.
Can you post the output of show spanning-tree interface
Regards,
Aninda
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App
11-04-2013 10:26 PM
I recently wrote about PVST simulation and its functioning. You can find it here:
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk621/technologies_tech_note09186a0080c180bd.shtml
This should give you insight into its workings and the reasoning behind it.
Regards,
Aninda
11-04-2013 05:38 PM
Yes, PVST runs STP instances for each vlans & MST running stp instace for a group of vlans. So your two different switches STP communication won't be understand by each other.
Following two post are very good reference if you interesting to go for details.
1. http://blog.ine.com/2008/07/27/mstp-tutorial-part-i-inside-a-region/
2. http://blog.ine.com/2008/09/24/mstp-tutorial-part-ii-outside-a-region/
HTH
Rasika
*** Pls rate all useful responses ***
11-04-2013 10:10 PM
Hi Mahesh,
When a MST running switch connects to another switch that is running PVST+ (or Rapid) then the boundary port (that connects to the non MST region) runs something called PVST simulation. This is needed so that the two different domains can understand each other and a common spanning tree can be built for your entire layer 2 topology.
Having said that, PVST simulation works with very specific rules. Failure to adhere to these rules will lead to the port being blocked due to PVST simulation failure.
Can you post the output of show spanning-tree interface
Regards,
Aninda
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App
11-04-2013 10:26 PM
I recently wrote about PVST simulation and its functioning. You can find it here:
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk621/technologies_tech_note09186a0080c180bd.shtml
This should give you insight into its workings and the reasoning behind it.
Regards,
Aninda
11-04-2013 11:43 PM
Hi Aninda,
Really cool paper
Regards
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
11-05-2013 08:58 AM
Hi Aninda,
Thanks for very useful info.
I will put output -- show spanning-tree interface
Best reagrds
Mahesh
11-05-2013 07:54 PM
Hi Aninda,
HEre is required info
sh spanning-tree int fastEthernet 0/1
Mst Instance Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
---------------- ---- --- --------- -------- --------------------------------
MST00 Desg BKN*100000 128.65 P2p Bound(PVST) *ROOT_Inc
Also here is morte info
sh spanning-tree int fastEthernet 0/1 detail
Port 65 (Port-channel1) of MST00 is broken (Root Inconsistent)
Port path cost 100000, Port priority 128, Port Identifier 128.65.
Designated root has priority 32768, address 000b.bece.bbc0
Designated bridge has priority 32768, address 000b.bece.bbc0
Designated port id is 128.65, designated path cost 0
Timers: message age 5, forward delay 0, hold 0
Number of transitions to forwarding state: 0
Link type is point-to-point by default, Boundary PVST
BPDU: sent 3, received 472
sh spanning-tree mst 0
###### MST00 vlans mapped: 1-4094
Bridge address 000b.bece.bbc0 priority 32768 (32768 sysid 0)
Root this switch for CST and IST
Configured hello time 2, forward delay 15, max age 20, max hops 20
Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
---------------- ---- --- --------- -------- --------------------------------
Po1 Desg BKN*100000 128.65 P2p Bound(PVST) *ROOT_Inc
Regards
MAhesh
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: