cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
306
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

dNAT question

rtjensen4
Level 4
Level 4

Out of curiosity,

Say I had to change the public IP of one of my servers from x.x.x.1 to y.y.y.3, and I didnt have access to the DNS to make the update, theoretically, could I use "ip nat inside destination" command with an access-list of 1 address to accomplish this?

I know this command is meant for load-balancing, but could I use it for this purpose? I don't have time to test this right now, but would like to tomorrow maybe.

Router config:

Fa0/1: peering IP with ISP (/30 network), would be ip nat outside

Fa0/0.1: x.x.x.x/28

Fa0/0.2: y.y.y.y/28

Fa0/0.2: z.z.z.z/28

SO... packets would be coming in fa0/1 and leaving via fa0/0.1 or fa0/0.2 to get to my servers.

Is there a better way of doing this? I don't see a whole lot about destination NAT out there. This is just a random question i had in my head, not a real issue.

1 Reply 1

Giuseppe Larosa
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Hello,

I think it should work it is like to have a cluster with a single member

Hope to help

Giuseppe

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card