Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
New Member

Does this make sense?

I dont get this config.

The ip address of the interface is a /30, since its a point o point.

But then the vrrp group is configured with a /24

They're also both on different subnets....???? Huh?

I dont get it. Im not sure what the other vrrp group is for either. Load sharing???

interface TenGigabitEthernet9/2

description To7609-2

ip address 71.22.7.129 255.255.255.252

vrrp 1 ip 71.22.7.1 255.255.255.0

vrrp 1 priority 120

vrrp 2 ip 71.22.4.1 255.255.255.0

vrrp 2 priority 120

Im used to seeing something like this:

int ge 1/0

ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0

vrrp 1 ip (OR standby 1 or GLBP 1) 10.10.10.1

and on the other router:

int gi1/0

ip address 10.10.10.3 255.25.255.0

vrrp 1 ip 10.10.10.1

4 REPLIES
Hall of Fame Super Silver

Re: Does this make sense?

Hello Joe,

I agree also on this first part

This is confirmed in configuration guide

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipapp/configuration/guide/ipapp_vrrp_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1055625

first hop redundancy but it should be in context.

Hope to help

Giuseppe

New Member

Re: Does this make sense?

Hi, Giuseppe:

Im sorry, but Im conused with your answer. What are you saying?

You agree with my concern/statement, or you agree with the configuation and think its correct.

What context?

Sorry :-(

Thanks

Hall of Fame Super Silver

Re: Does this make sense?

Hello Joe,

I agree with your concern.

If we put a vrrp group it needs to use an ip address that belongs to an ip subnet that is advertised in some way primary or secondary ip address of the lan interface(s).

context = routing context

Sorry if I've confused you

Hope to help

Giuseppe

New Member

Re: Does this make sense?

Ok, thats what I thought. Maybe its just a typo. Or maybe the guy is on crack. :-)

Thanks

122
Views
5
Helpful
4
Replies
CreatePlease to create content