It is very important for be, because i am going to take the BSCI exam for CCNP.
OK. So am I finally right in thinking, that the "Fd is 0" is an IOS Bug? (I have seen it more often than just in this cisco document)
So i conclude, that this route does only have 2 successors.
But why is the third line displayed, although it is not a feasible successor?
quotation from cisco.com
"The show ip eigrp topology command can be used without any keywords or arguments. If this command is used without any keywords or arguments, then only routes that are feasible successors are displayed."
OK. Another Output from cisco
P 172.16.81.0 255.255.255.0, 1 successors, FD is 307200
via Connected, Ethernet1
via 172.16.81.28 (307200/281600), Ethernet1
via 172.16.80.28 (307200/281600), Ethernet0
via 172.16.80.31 (332800/307200), Serial0
So in this example, which is my successor (first line indicates that there is only 1) ?
via 172.16.81.28 or via via 172.16.80.28
or is the router load-balancing?
I asumme the .80.31 route is not a successor, but why displayed?????
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...