03-27-2012 03:47 PM - edited 03-07-2019 05:49 AM
Is it possible to issue eigrp leaking routes on catalyst 6500 running IOS 12.2-33SXI9 on gigabitethernet interfaces? or is there another way to acomplish this?
Regards
Oscar
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-28-2012 01:27 PM
Yep, my bad. I saw there wasn't a commit to SXI for summary leaking (but there was for stub leaking) and made a bad assumption. Apparently SXI got the summary leak enhancement through a sync from another branch instead of a direct commit and I didn't look far enough to find it via the sync. Sorry for the mis-information.
I did, however, find your problem. There is an outstanding defect that the summary-leak enhancement doesn't work on sub-interfaces (CSCsz90607). This is undoubtedly what you're hitting.
Again, sorry for the mistake.
03-27-2012 04:05 PM
What do you mean by "EIGRP leaking routes"?
From one EIGRP domain to another?
03-27-2012 04:09 PM
Hi Sharifi, i need to publish a more accurate route through a summarization
03-27-2012 04:12 PM
What is the design look like?
What are you trying to accomplish?
03-27-2012 07:09 PM
I'll check when I get to the office tomorrow, but I'm pretty sure summary leaking should be in SXI9, which is running EIGRP release 5. I actually wrote the stub and summary leaking enhancement several years ago, which should have been well before rel 5. When you do the summary-address interface command do you see a leak-map option?
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App
03-28-2012 05:37 AM
Hi Donald, this is what i see when i try to issue the command
er-mun(config)#int gigabitEthernet 3/0/0.2
er-mun(config-subif)#$address eigrp 4944 10.168.0.0 255.254.0.0 ?
<1-255> Administrative distance
er-mun(config)#int atM 1/1/0.41
er-mun(config-subif)#$address eigrp 4944 10.168.0.0 255.254.0.0 ?
<1-255> Administrative distance
It seems not to be available on this type of interfaces.
System image file is "sup-bootdisk:s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI9.bin"
er-mun#sh module
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
1 0 2 port adapter Enhanced FlexWAN WS-X6582-2PA JAE1127NX20
2 48 48 port 10/100/1000mb EtherModule WS-X6148-GE-TX SAL1129V7XJ
3 0 4-subslot SPA Interface Processor-400 7600-SIP-400 SAL1536PDES
4 0 2 port adapter Enhanced FlexWAN WS-X6582-2PA JAE1130RHSG
5 16 SFM-capable 16 port 1000mb GBIC WS-X6516-GBIC SAD054502YD
8 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3BXL SAL1126SDG9
13 0 2 port adapter Enhanced FlexWAN WS-X6582-2PA JAE11054GE4
Regards
Oscar
03-28-2012 06:00 AM
Sorry about that, but it looks like you're out of luck. I commited the Stub leaking enhancement first and it made it into SXI. The summary leaking enhancement was added later and didn't make it into SXI. IIRC, by the time we got the summary leaking change ready, SXI was closed to new features/featurettes and would only take fixes. This didn't qualify. I might be wrong on the timing, but I'm certain that the enhancement wasn't added to SXI.
03-28-2012 08:53 AM
Donald, i try to issue the command on the same switch but using a serial interface and for some reason "i do not know" it's available.
er-mun(config)#int serial 13/0/1
er-mun(config-if)#ip summary-address eigrp 444 10.168.0.0 255.254.0.0 ?
<1-255> Administrative distance
leak-map Allow dynamic prefixes based on the leak-map
What could it be the reason????
03-28-2012 01:27 PM
Yep, my bad. I saw there wasn't a commit to SXI for summary leaking (but there was for stub leaking) and made a bad assumption. Apparently SXI got the summary leak enhancement through a sync from another branch instead of a direct commit and I didn't look far enough to find it via the sync. Sorry for the mis-information.
I did, however, find your problem. There is an outstanding defect that the summary-leak enhancement doesn't work on sub-interfaces (CSCsz90607). This is undoubtedly what you're hitting.
Again, sorry for the mistake.
03-28-2012 02:06 PM
Hi Donald, you are absolutely right, i just test on a interface without the sub-interface configuration and it works!!!
Do you know if there is a workaround??? Maybe an IOS upgrade???
Thank you so much!!
Oscar
03-29-2012 06:27 AM
The bug is hasn't been fixed yet. Talk to your account team to get some visibility on the customer impact so it gets some priority.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide