Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

EIGRP LEAKING ROUTES

Is it possible to issue eigrp leaking routes on catalyst 6500 running IOS 12.2-33SXI9 on gigabitethernet interfaces? or is there another way to acomplish this?

Regards

Oscar

  • LAN Switching and Routing
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Bronze

Re: EIGRP LEAKING ROUTES

Yep, my bad.  I saw there wasn't a commit to SXI for summary leaking (but there was for stub leaking) and made a bad assumption.  Apparently SXI got the summary leak enhancement through a sync from another branch instead of a direct commit and I didn't look far enough to find it via the sync.    Sorry for the mis-information.

I did, however, find your problem.  There is an outstanding defect that the summary-leak enhancement doesn't work on sub-interfaces (CSCsz90607).  This is undoubtedly what you're hitting.

Again, sorry for the mistake.

10 REPLIES
VIP Super Bronze

EIGRP LEAKING ROUTES

What do you mean by "EIGRP leaking routes"?

From one EIGRP domain to another?

New Member

EIGRP LEAKING ROUTES

Hi Sharifi, i need to publish a more accurate route through a summarization

VIP Super Bronze

EIGRP LEAKING ROUTES

What is the design look like?

What are you trying to accomplish?

Bronze

Re: EIGRP LEAKING ROUTES

I'll check when I get to the office tomorrow, but I'm pretty sure summary leaking should be in SXI9, which is running EIGRP release 5. I actually wrote the stub and summary leaking enhancement several years ago, which should have been well before rel 5. When you do the summary-address interface command do you see a leak-map option?

Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

New Member

Re: EIGRP LEAKING ROUTES

Hi Donald, this is what i see when i try to issue the command

er-mun(config)#int gigabitEthernet 3/0/0.2

er-mun(config-subif)#$address eigrp 4944 10.168.0.0 255.254.0.0 ?

  <1-255>  Administrative distance

 

er-mun(config)#int atM 1/1/0.41

er-mun(config-subif)#$address eigrp 4944 10.168.0.0 255.254.0.0 ?

  <1-255>  Administrative distance

 

It seems not to be available on this type of interfaces.

System image file is "sup-bootdisk:s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI9.bin"

er-mun#sh module

Mod Ports Card Type                              Model              Serial No.

--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------

  1    0  2 port adapter Enhanced FlexWAN        WS-X6582-2PA       JAE1127NX20

  2   48  48 port 10/100/1000mb EtherModule      WS-X6148-GE-TX     SAL1129V7XJ

  3    0  4-subslot SPA Interface Processor-400  7600-SIP-400       SAL1536PDES

  4    0  2 port adapter Enhanced FlexWAN        WS-X6582-2PA       JAE1130RHSG

  5   16  SFM-capable 16 port 1000mb GBIC        WS-X6516-GBIC      SAD054502YD

  8    2  Supervisor Engine 720 (Active)         WS-SUP720-3BXL     SAL1126SDG9

13    0  2 port adapter Enhanced FlexWAN        WS-X6582-2PA       JAE11054GE4

Regards

Oscar

Bronze

Re: EIGRP LEAKING ROUTES

Sorry about that, but it looks like you're out of luck.  I commited the Stub leaking enhancement first and it made it into SXI.  The summary leaking enhancement was added later and didn't make it into SXI.  IIRC, by the time we got the summary leaking change ready, SXI was closed to new features/featurettes and would only take fixes.  This didn't qualify. I might be wrong on the timing, but I'm certain that the enhancement wasn't added to SXI.

New Member

Re: EIGRP LEAKING ROUTES

Donald, i try to issue the command on the same switch but using a serial interface and for some reason "i do not know" it's available.

er-mun(config)#int serial 13/0/1

er-mun(config-if)#ip summary-address eigrp 444 10.168.0.0 255.254.0.0 ?

  <1-255>   Administrative distance

  leak-map  Allow dynamic prefixes based on the leak-map

 

What could it be the reason????

Bronze

Re: EIGRP LEAKING ROUTES

Yep, my bad.  I saw there wasn't a commit to SXI for summary leaking (but there was for stub leaking) and made a bad assumption.  Apparently SXI got the summary leak enhancement through a sync from another branch instead of a direct commit and I didn't look far enough to find it via the sync.    Sorry for the mis-information.

I did, however, find your problem.  There is an outstanding defect that the summary-leak enhancement doesn't work on sub-interfaces (CSCsz90607).  This is undoubtedly what you're hitting.

Again, sorry for the mistake.

New Member

Re: EIGRP LEAKING ROUTES

Hi Donald, you are absolutely right, i just test on a interface without the sub-interface configuration and it works!!!

Do you know if there is a workaround??? Maybe an IOS upgrade???

Thank you so much!!

Oscar

588
Views
0
Helpful
10
Replies
This widget could not be displayed.