Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Community Member

Eigrp_Static_Routing_Issue

Redistribution betweem Eigrp and Static routes are not happening properly.

Network Diagram is attached.

Pls help.

2 REPLIES

Re: Eigrp_Static_Routing_Issue

Hi,

I will suggest following

1.Redistribute static into EIGRP on router R5

2.Run eBGP between EIGRP 1 & EIGRP 2 autonomous systems

HTH...rate if helpful..

Hall of Fame Super Silver

Re: Eigrp_Static_Routing_Issue

Hello Saravana,

you need to provide a return path for packets originated on R5 to have ping tests to be successuful

Note 3:

automatic failover : --> you need a dynamic protocol on the two links.

the best choice is BGP.

R5 needs to redistribute in EIGRP static routes pointing to R6

redistribution of static routes in R3 and R4 just allows them to reach 50.50.50.50 on EIGRP AS 1.

use on R1 and R2 AS 65001

AS 65002 on R3 and R4.

R1:

router bgp 65001

neighbor 172.16.10.2 remote-as 65002

network 20.20.20.0 mask 255.255.255.252

network 30.30.30.0 mask 255.255.255.252

network 50.50.50.50 mask 255.255.255.255

router eigrp 1

red bgp 65001

R2:

router bgp 65001

neighbor 172.16.20.2 remote-as 65002

network 20.20.20.0 mask 255.255.255.252

network 30.30.30.0 mask 255.255.255.252

network 50.50.50.50 mask 255.255.255.255

router eigrp 1

red bgp 65001

R3:

router bgp 65002

neighbor 172.16.10.1 remote-as 65001

network 192.168.10.0 mask 255.255.255.252

network 192.168.20.0 mask 255.255.255.252

network 10.10.10.0 mask 255.255.255.252

network 60.60.60.60 mask 255.255.255.255

!

router eigrp 2

red bgp 65002

R4)

router bgp 65002

neighbor 172.16.20.1 remote-as 65001

network 192.168.10.0 mask 255.255.255.252

network 192.168.20.0 mask 255.255.255.252

network 10.10.10.0 mask 255.255.255.252

network 60.60.60.60 mask 255.255.255.255

!

router eigrp 2

red bgp 65002

R5

router eigrp 2

red static

Hope to help

Giuseppe

122
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies
CreatePlease to create content