EIGRP summary route learned but not installed in routing table
I have router R1 and R2 running EIGRP in between. They are in two different locations connected by a Layer 2 metro Ethernet link. Each router is sending and learning multiple /24 subnets for the location through EIGRP.
On the interface of each router, I configured a EIGRP summary route as the following. I can see R1's summary route in R2's EIGRP database and vise versa, and all the more specific routes are not shown accordingly. But the issue is R2 didn't install R1's summary route in its routing table even though the summary route is supposed to have administrative distance of 5. R2's summary route is not in R1's routing table either.
How can I make the summary route into routing table?
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...