Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Etherchannel on 3650E

Am I correct in thinking that all load-balancing and forwarding decisions are made in hardware and that there will not be any performance hit on the switch when enabling this?

Thanks

Trev

Everyone's tags (3)
3 REPLIES
Hall of Fame Super Gold

Re: Etherchannel on 3650E

Yes.

Re: Etherchannel on 3650E

Hi,

Am I correct in thinking that all load-balancing and forwarding decisions are made in hardware   ---- Yes. The load-balancing of the packet in etherchannel is depends upon how you conifgured that based on that the switch will to do loadbalancing.

There is 6 method to do loadbalance of the packet in the etherchannel link,

port-channel load-balance {dst-ip | dst-mac | src-dst-ip |       src-dst-mac | src-ip | src-mac}

Depends upon your need to can configure etherchannel load balance.i.e) if you have multiple source and single destination then you can use src-ip or src-mac

If you have multiple destination then this scenario we can use dst-mac.

when the traffic is coming to the switch,based on our etherchannel config, the mac/ip address will convert into binary and the switch will  send the traffic over multiple links.

for more information , have a look into this below url

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3560/software/release/12.1_19_ea1/configuration/guide/swethchl.html


http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094714.shtml#catalyst

Regards

Karuppu

Silver

Re: Etherchannel on 3650E

You are correct its completly hardware based and will not cause any effect on the performance of the device. Just keep in mind the load balancing is never per packet based so its not equal load balance. it could be on the basis of sr/dest mac or ip add.

HTH

Varun

777
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies