Thanks for your quick response on this, i understood the concept but still i have some doubt if i want to provide redundancy for servers using switch then which one is better option between stacking and etherchannel.
It depend on the type of switches you are using. For example, if you are using 3750 series switches, you can stack multiple switches together to have switch redundancy and also have multiple uplinks from the stack to the servers using Etherchannel to get link redundancy.
So, lets say you have 2 switches stacked, you can then have a connection from each switch to your servers (if your servers have multiple NICs) using Etherchannel. Now you have switch and NIC redundancy.
i understood the concept but still i have some doubt if i want to provide redundancy for servers using switch then which one is better option between stacking and etherchannel.
Maybe you "understand the concept". But I believe you'll get a better grasp of the scenario if you actually get the chance to stack two (or more) 3750, 3650 or 3850 together and then configure etherchannel. Do not configure the etherchannel in one switch. Instead, configure the etherchannel in multiple switches that are part of the same stack. Do this and you will get a clear picture and not just a "concept". Stacking and Etherchannel has been on-going since the introduction of the 3750 family of switches. You will appreciate the technology more by configuring Etherchannel with Stacking instead of just plainly reading it.
NOTE: You really want to avoid using Catalyst switches for access to servers. This is because Catalyst switches were intentionally built with very shallow memory buffers. The shallow memory buffers are no match to the intensity of continuous flow of data to and from servers.
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Normally you would want both.
I.e. Etherchannel with links to different stacked switch ports.
As Leo notes, unfortunately, many (all?) of Cisco's stackable have rather shallow buffers. However, this doesn't guarantee that they are totally unacceptable to be used with servers, but they can be. It really depends on your expected traffic patterns. (It also depends what ports you use. On the 3750X, uplink ports have more buffer memory to share than the copper edge ports. Also the later stackable switches often support 10g ports too.)
Question We run asr9001 with XR 6.1.3, and we have a very long delay to
login w/ SSH 1 or 2 to the device compare to IOS device. After
investigation, the there is 1s delay between the client KEXDH_INIT and
the server (XR) KEXDH_REPLY. After debug ssh serv...
Introduction The purpose of this document is to demonstrate the Open
Shortest Path First (OSPF) behavior when the V-bit (Virtual-link bit) is
present in a non-backbone area. The V-bit is signaled in Type-1 LSA only
if the router is the endpoint of one or ...
Hi, I am seeing quite a few issues with patch install and wanted to
share my experience and workaround to this. Login to admin via CLI, then
access root with the “shell” command Issue “df –h” and you’ll probably
see the following directory full or nearly ...