let's say I have a router on a stick topology with 2 sub-interfaces, representing 2 vlans. let's say one of these is untagged. When my router receives traffic from the untagged vlan it's going to be expecting a vlan tag per the command encapsulation dot1q. I know i can use the command encapsulation dot1q vlan 10 native or whatever. My question is that if i didn't tell my router to specifically accept un-tagged traffic would routing work between the 2 vlans?
One a similar note, at my current job i've been configuring all of our waps as flex-connect where I trunk the ports between the wap and the switch but tell the switch to untag the traffic on the wap subnet (native vlan 200). On my router i have a sub-interface that corrensponds to the subnet of my wap (with the command encapsulation dot1q 200). Routing works fine. i can ping the waps etc. . I guess my question is why. The traffic coming from my wap isn't tagged with the vlan id 200 and my router is expecting that vlan tag. I think i'm confusing myself here. :) a little enlightenment would be appreciated.
Question We run asr9001 with XR 6.1.3, and we have a very long delay to
login w/ SSH 1 or 2 to the device compare to IOS device. After
investigation, the there is 1s delay between the client KEXDH_INIT and
the server (XR) KEXDH_REPLY. After debug ssh serv...
Introduction The purpose of this document is to demonstrate the Open
Shortest Path First (OSPF) behavior when the V-bit (Virtual-link bit) is
present in a non-backbone area. The V-bit is signaled in Type-1 LSA only
if the router is the endpoint of one or ...
Hi, I am seeing quite a few issues with patch install and wanted to
share my experience and workaround to this. Login to admin via CLI, then
access root with the “shell” command Issue “df –h” and you’ll probably
see the following directory full or nearly ...