cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
4066
Views
4
Helpful
7
Replies

how to control bandwidth at individual interface in cisco 4948?

winnthu
Level 1
Level 1

Hi,

I have cisco 4948 switch and I want to control in and out bandwidth of individual interface in Cisco 4948. I try to search cisco site and I am out of luck. I tried with class-map configuration and it can only control to only one interface. Once I add another interface the configure bandwidth does not work. Here is my config

class-map match-all Client-pc

match any

class-map match-all Any-traffic

match any

!

!

policy-map 2Mb

class Any-traffic

police 2 mbps 256 kbyte conform-action transmit exceed-action drop

policy-map 1Mb

class Any-traffic

police 1 mbps 128 kbyte conform-action transmit exceed-action drop

policy-map 1Mb_client

class Client-pc

police 1.5 mbps 32 kbyte conform-action transmit exceed-action drop

policy-map 2Mb_client

class Client-pc

police 2 mbps 32 kbyte conform-action transmit exceed-action drop

!

interface GigabitEthernet1/4

description server

switchport access vlan 2

switchport mode access

duplex full

no cdp enable

spanning-tree portfast

spanning-tree bpduguard enable

service-policy input 1Mb

service-policy output 2Mb

end

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Collin Clark
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

Here's a working config (note this is for a 3550 though).

class-map match-all c_Outbound

match access-group 101

class-map match-all c_MarkDSCP

match access-group 102

class-map match-all c_Inbound

match ip dscp 60

!

!

policy-map p_Outbound

class c_Outbound

police 1528000 8000 exceed-action drop

policy-map p_MarkDSCP

class c_MarkDSCP

set dscp 60

policy-map p_Inbound

class c_Inbound

police 1528000 8000 exceed-action drop

!

interface FastEthernet0/11

switchport access vlan 110

switchport mode access

service-policy input p_MarkDSCP

spanning-tree portfast

!

interface FastEthernet0/12

switchport access vlan 12

switchport mode access

service-policy input p_Outbound

service-policy output p_Inbound

spanning-tree portfast

access-list 101 permit ip host 112.81.61.79 any

access-list 102 permit ip any host 112.81.61.79

View solution in original post

7 Replies 7

Collin Clark
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

Here's a working config (note this is for a 3550 though).

class-map match-all c_Outbound

match access-group 101

class-map match-all c_MarkDSCP

match access-group 102

class-map match-all c_Inbound

match ip dscp 60

!

!

policy-map p_Outbound

class c_Outbound

police 1528000 8000 exceed-action drop

policy-map p_MarkDSCP

class c_MarkDSCP

set dscp 60

policy-map p_Inbound

class c_Inbound

police 1528000 8000 exceed-action drop

!

interface FastEthernet0/11

switchport access vlan 110

switchport mode access

service-policy input p_MarkDSCP

spanning-tree portfast

!

interface FastEthernet0/12

switchport access vlan 12

switchport mode access

service-policy input p_Outbound

service-policy output p_Inbound

spanning-tree portfast

access-list 101 permit ip host 112.81.61.79 any

access-list 102 permit ip any host 112.81.61.79

Thanks for the prompt reply collin. I will try with access-list and will post the result here.

Cheers

I tried with your solution. It can control, but I found that inbound and outbound bandwidth rate with police does not reflect the actual bandwidth going in and out. Is that normal?

Thanks in advance for your help.

Regards,

No, it should police the traffic. I don't have a whole lot of experience on the 4948's, their queuing is probably different.

Thanks Collin, after I increase the burst rate it reflects the in and out that I control.

Regards,

Great, what did you set it too (so I can change my doc)?

Hi Collin,

I raise the burst rate to 512KB. Here is my policy setting.

policy-map srv_in

class srv_in

police 4096000 bps 512000 byte conform-action transmit exceed-action drop

policy-map srv_out

class c_in

police 2048000 bps 512000 byte conform-action transmit exceed-action drop

Looks like burst rate setting speaks a lot. I tried with Passmark advance network test. If I use fixed data block size with the above setting I got the bandwidth that I set. But not exact though. Very close. If I use variable data size, the bandwidth result get higher.

Regards,

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card