I know that one can use the "redundancy" option on a static NAT to deal with duplicate IP messages when using the same NAT's on multiple HSRP routers.
I'm trying to think through when this should be necessary. Why do routers with duplicate NAT's, on the same LAN, complain about a conflict if only one NAT is in use? Shouldn't the backup router's NAT be dormant, since there is no traffic going through it?
The best I've found is this, which doesn't really help. The routers advertise the NAT?:
I need a help on configuring HSRP on SUP level on 2 of the 6513 switches. Can you help us to know how we can configure HSRP between two SUP32 or can you provide us a document that will help us to conigure it? Your reply on this will be really appreciated.
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3. 16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are looking for early feedback from custome...