Cisco Support Community
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

HSRP + load-balancing

Dear Experts ,

Please find the attached network diagram.

we want to do load-balancing between E1's which was mentioned in the diagram.

Generally , how to achieve load-balancing using HSRP ?

I know we can go for MHSRP ,, but we do not want to use MHSRP.Any idea ?




Re: HSRP + load-balancing

Aren't you making matter more complex than is needed? You should not need to run HSRP at all in this scenario.

Use an ipservices image on the L3switch and run EIGRP or OSPF. The def gw can be located on the switch as well, if that dies there is very little left to recover.

You can then configure your load balancing with the routing protocol and it will all become much easier. In this way you can even load balance traffic to your default route.




Re: HSRP + load-balancing

Hi Leo ,

Thanks for your reply..i know ospf does load balacing and we can do load balancing with eigrp also with the help of variance.

But our concern is how to load balance with HSRP..Any idea.. ?



Re: HSRP + load-balancing

HSRP serves a different purpose, namely to offer a default gateway to hosts in the LANunder all circumstances.

Therefore, the use of HSRP is only at some distance related to load balancing. In fact, load balancing is the next step and it can be implemented differently by the vendor on each routerplatform.

In situations where both links are available you will need a routing protocol to specify available paths and their respective loads. Some kind of variance will be needed also because the alternative path has an extra hop (from router1 to router2 via the LAN) and hence also a different metric. This was in fact why I advised you to look at the switch as the def gw because from it's perspective both paths are equal in cost.

Bottomline is that HSRP in itself was not intended to do load balancing, a routing protocol is needed in addition to it.



Cisco Employee

Re: HSRP + load-balancing


Still I am not sure, what your requirements are to rule out a dynamic routing protocol like OSPF, which could be used in conjunction with HSRP. Thus I do not know, if HSRP or GLBP described below will give you the desired results.

If you do not want to use a dynamic routing protocol, you can get sort of load balancing with HSRP by using two HSRP groups per LAN segment. One HSRP group uses f.e. as virtual IP and the other group uses f.e. and have half of the hosts on with as default gateway, the other half has

You might want to have a look at Gateway Load Balancing Protocol (GLBP), which offers HSRP functionality plus loadbalancing with a single default gateway IP.

Details about GLBP can be found at "Configuring GLBP"

Hope this helps! Please rate all posts.

Regards, Martin

CreatePlease to create content