I thought this would work so I could make a single link both L2 and L3
I set this up and I can ping all the gateways but never the hosts. I was hoping I could make these links between 6500's a mix of L2 and L3. Check it out. They are connected in a linear fashion R1--->R2--->R3. I can ping from R1 to R3's SVI4 gateway but I can never ping a host on that SVI4. I was hoping that I could use the port-channels between 6500's as routed links or as trunk links depending on the type of traffic....thought it would help ease the migration. I suppose I could always get rid of the port-channels and just make separate L2 and L3 links between the 6500's.
I thought this would work so I could make a single link both L2
I will go check on the host based firewalls but I don't think that is the case. The hosts had the correct gateway. Did you check the config? All the routes are in the routing table, too. I can't understand why the hosts are never pingable. If I have one host on R1's Vlan 2 and another host on R3's Vlan 4, I can ping the respective gateway to/from each but can't ping the hosts in either direction. Does the concept of what I am trying to do at least make sense?
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.