In which occasion router-->SwitchL3 does not need switchport?
Imagine I have a Router(fa0/0)--connected to--->SwitchFa1/0/20 port.
I thought that I needed to do 'no switchport' in order to make the switchport work as a layer 3 interface and make my switch port communicate and forward traffic with the router. However, someone told me that the below would make this work without 'no switchport' and without an ip address.
Does the below make sense?
description switch port is connected to MYBACKUPROUTERWAN (VPN 1841 router)
Re: In which occasion router-->SwitchL3 does not need switchport
Then that makes sense. If you have clients on the switch in vlan 2 they will be able to communicate with the router. If you have clients on the switch in any other vlan then you would need to route them on a different interface.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.