I just bought some Catalyst 3560-X switches that came with IOS 12.2(55)SE3 on them. I'm definitely a proponent of not fixing things that aren't broken when devices are in production, but I was going to at least upgrade to 12.2(58)SE2 before deployment to ensure I have the latest bugfix release in this version tree.
I noticed that 15.0(1)SE2 was also available, so for grins I compared the two versions in the feature navigator. As it turns out there aren't any feature differences between the two and the memory requirements are the same.
For most software the higher version numbers mean more features or better compatibiliity or somesuch. With IOS--at least with this comparison--that doesn't seem to be the case. Why are these two releases the same, and why would I or would I not want to put the 15.0 image on my switches before deployment? Why did Cisco decide to preinstall 12.2 instead of 15.0?
Sometimes I just don't understand Cisco's version numbering or IOS version selection for their products.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.