I have setup a L2L VPN between Cisco 857 (ADSL modem/router) in a branch and the Nokia IP130 Firewall at the main office. I am having the follwowing issues and I will appreciate your input
1) I would like the machines inside the remote office (LAN2) to connect to the main office (LAN1) for AD, but to use its own ISP gateway for Internet access.
At the moment, it seems like all traffic has been redirected through the VPN. ie - a PC in LAN 2 with DNS server pointing to reach ISP's, can't reach the Internet. Using a packet analyser, i can see that DNS requests are sent, but replies are not coming back. I figure that they might be stopped in the Nokia Firewall Gateway in the other end, to which i have limited access to check the logs.
I have also debugged ip packets at the router, and see no activity of any ACL stopping the reply packets.
The interesting parts of the Cisco configuration are as follwos:
--- NAT setup
ip nat inside source route-map NONAT interface Dialer1 overload
--- Route-map (I have read mixed posts saying that sometimes this approach does not work)
I would like to know why it is not recommended, and what the alternatives are for desing, in this case. I imagine that this is a common case where you have a main office and a branch, with a L2L connection?
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.