Hello everyone - first time posting, but I will try to be very clear with my objectives - thanks in advance for your help.
We have a data center that has a Cisco 6513 Core right now with 13 blades. This core has all of our servers and users plugged into it and the other day we lost it for 4 hours and all LAN users were disconnected. Additionally, data on our servers was innacessible because those servers too were connected to the core.
We need to introduce some redundancy into this setup and I'm really looking for a really solid way to achieve this and looking for opinions, like "pie in the sky" solutions if money were not really an object.
One option I thought of right away so far was to leave the core for our users and keep them plugged into it, but upgrade our wireless system (I believe they have 1G now) or something much stronger than we currently have and then if they lost connectivity to the core, they could connect to the wireless controller that would be connected to a new stacked switch we would purchase (probably 3570's) that would be directly connected to our existing router.
These 3570's could be plugged into each of our servers and be dual-homed so that again, if the core went down, the stacked switches would take-over and users in our Office (about 200 of them) could still work temporarily until the core was restored. If both this new proposed core and the existing 6513 core were up, we would use both and just have more bandwith available.
What problems do you see with this configuration? I believe it covers us because all our servers, even those that are critical to host to our WAN, would be dual-homed to the new 3570 side, so again, if we lose the core, we are still up from a system side serving data to the rest of the company (Outside our office).
What other options do people see, perhaps getting a completely redundant core? But can you even find 6513's these-days and should we just buy the same one and put it in there?
Any other crazy ideas people have? In case anyone is wondering, we do use virtualization with a SAN.
Thanks everyone, appreciate the time anyone takes to help with this scenario.
But can you even find 6513's these-days and should we just buy the same one and put it in there?
Cisco released the 6513E a few months ago. Goes well with the new Sup2T (same price as the Sup720). One thing with pairing Sup2T together is forming a VSS. It's like joining two 3750 together to form a virtual swictch.
You may want to consider upgrading into something like this.
One of the benefits of joining two 6500E chassis together and form a VSS is, like the 3750, you configure both chassis as one.
Is your LAN a flat network? If this is so, you need to re-design your network.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...