Layer 4 Switching or WCCP for Ironport Web Filter Deployment
We are in the process of implimenting Cisco's Ironport S160 appliance for web filtering. I have a choice between integrating via WCCP at our PIX firewall, or on a layer 4 switch. We do have a 6509 in our core with a SUP1a MSFC1 PFC1.
Can we go the layer 4 route on the 6509? Do I have all I need for that? If so would there be an advantage going that route? The documentation seems very vague on the layer 4 configuration, it basically says set the Ironport device to Layer 4 mode and that's it.
Re: Layer 4 Switching or WCCP for Ironport Web Filter Deployment
I actually wasn't refering to WCCP Support for the Pix, but for Layer 4 integration support on the 6509 (instead of WCCP on the Pix) as the documentation is really vague about the differances between the two options and how you would configure Layer 4 integration.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.